Categories
Faith

What Are We Hoping For When We Show Up?

I’m supposed to write a roughly monthly column for Christians on the Left, but I’ve failed at that recently. Partly it’s because there’s so much noise at the moment, so much opinion, so little certainty, that I quite often think that the last thing anyone needs is me spouting off again. People talking about faith and politics seem so much more qualified, knowledgable and eloquent than me, i’ve silenced myself. If only some other people thought like that occasionally. That said, recently I’ve been reading Andy Flannagan’s fantastic book “Those Who Show Up” and it has rocked me to the core in the space of two chapters, so here I am again, writing about something I know very little about.

Andy’s book is a call for a both-and kind of approach to faith and politics. We can bring the prophetic voice calling for change, development, justice and progress from the sidelines. Sometimes that is needed. Sometimes it is the only course of action available. At other times, I would say mainly in Andy’s thesis, the real effect can be made by those who offer themselves within the system or the process. Are we willing to suffer endless meetings, bureaucracy, red tape, hold ups and so on? Are we willing to commit to a group of people, to foster community in an area, to seek justice and quality of life for all, not just the people who are like us? Are we willing to be frustrated continually, and yet remain faithful to the vision that we have and are working out? It sounds a lot like the Church of England to me.

I remember being intensely frustrated with the CofE as a firebrand-y unthinkingly conservative evangelical teenager. I was conservative because I was told to be. At least I stood for God’s ideals, I thought. I thought the CofE a hopelessly outmoded and outdated institution in which the Holy Spirit and its transforming power was not present or evident, and that it hadn’t been for some time. I thought this because I couldn’t work out what the CofE stood for. It never seemed to have a firm position on anything. It was boring, lifeless and so on and so on and boringly so on. Now, at the grand old age of 30 I find myself more excited about being part of an established Church than ever. “A Christian presence in every community” the streamline says. A sacramental presence in every community more like, as Christians embedded in the lives of their local communities show something of the light and life of Jesus to all, where all are prayed for, whether they be knowingly part of a church or not, where no-one is cast out, no-one is forgotten. Christians aren’t called to separate themselves from their communities. They are called to be at the heart of them. They’re called to set the agenda, not dogmatically or doctrinally, but in terms of the living of lives which infectiously, even contagiously, spread love, joy, peace, justice and hope. They do this by pointing to God, seeking the benefit of others over themselves. We can’t say, or sing, that we are seeking first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, or that we want to glorify, or lift him high on the one hand, and then put ourselves first on the other. What would our politics look like if we committed to putting others and God before ourselves?

Sometimes we need to get angry, to rant and rave. At other times, we need to lovingly coax things along, bringing light in to places of darkness, hope into places where it is lacking. Andy is quite right though, it’s all very well talking about it, but what are we actually willing to do? How much will we sacrifice? Will we think of the other or seek only health, wealth and happiness for ourselves? Is it all about prosperity and growth?

All I can say is, after two chapters, I’ve taken the plunge and joined my first political party.

Goodness knows what’ll happen when I read the rest of it.

So I suppose this is where I (finally) get to my (highly-opinionated) point. For those of us who say that we follow Jesus and put the agenda of the kingdom before everything else, there has to somewhere be the acceptance that eschatology, the end times and the age to come, play a huge role in the shaping of our faith. Christianity is a future-facing faith. As we are forgiven and freed for joyful obedience, we are freed not to look back, but to look forward, to a time when man’s inhumanity to man will be no more, when all our hopes will be realised, all our fears and sorrows will be no more, where the meek will have inherited the earth, where the last will have finished their race and come in first, where the riches we stored up for ourselves on Earth will have been eaten up and destroyed, and what we will be left with is the question, “what did you do to the least of this, my brothers? What did you therefore do to me?” We have a leader, a pattern maker for our lives who came not to be served, but to serve and to give his life as a ransom payment that we might have live, have it to the full, and share out of the abundance that we have with others.

As we show up this Thursday, let’s not leave it there. Let’s continually show up. Let’s offer our lives in the service of the voiceless, the marginalised, the dispossessed, those who are discriminated against. Let’s find ways to serve, rather than to seek to gain power, authority and to be served ourselves. Let’s cast off any sense of entitlement, clinging only to our one true birthright, to be called children and friends of God, because he chose to call us that, and because Jesus made it possible.

Who knows whether I’m right or not? More than likely at times we need to be on the sidelines too, or marching in the demonstrations, signing petitions, calling and holding elected representatives to account, but more than ever, it seems to me that it might just be the moment to look inside ourselves and ask the question of what God might be asking or encouraging of us in the places where we are? Where might we be being sent? Are we willing to go? What are we hoping for when we show up?

 

Categories
Christians on the Left

Who Do We Want to Be Led By?

A few months ago, I wrote a piece asking the question of what kind of leader we seek, and the kind of leader we seek to be in the areas of life that we lead.

Who Do We Want to Be Led By?

Categories
Christians on the Left

Safety

Earlier this month I wrote some new words for my friends at Christians on the Left. If you’ve not had a chance to read them yet, now you can.

Safety

Categories
Christians on the Left Faith

Agents For Change

I recently made my debut writing for Christians on the Left. You can read my first column, about the recent Greenbelt-hosted debate on the forthcoming general election, here:

———-

Haydon Spenceley writes from Greenbelt where the motion “This House Believes The 2015 Election Will Make No Significant Difference to the Future of Britain” was being debated. Haydon reminds us of the importance of the coming election and that however broken the system, it is better to be involved. 

Greenbelt is traversing its third afternoon in the beautiful surroundings of new home Boughton House (beautiful, that is, aside from the molehills, but I think that is a particularly wheelchair user-centric concern). A heartening huge body of people have gathered together around the motion “This House Believes The 2015 Election Will Make No Significant Difference to the Future of Britain”. Arguing for the motion are Louise Donkin of SPEAK and Martin Newell of the Catholic Worker Network. Their opponents in this gladiatorial contest are to be the Labour MP Gavin Shuker, and Pippa Morgan of the Lib Dem Christian Forum. It is noteworthy that the Conservatives are not represented, in spite of repeated requests to provide a contributing speaker. One can only speculate as to why, but the lack of a viewpoint from the Tory side of things is arguably to the detriment of the otherwise-useful conversation which unfolds. Interestingly, the room is split fairly evenly when asked to vote on the motion at the beginning of the debate. Will things change?

Arguing for the notion, Louise and Martin speak with considerable and commendable passion and insight, both offering radical alternative approaches to the future for British politics and for Britain as a whole. Their contention, again and again, is that the systems which British politics and British life, indeed, are built on, are intrinsically broken and need to be not just brushed up, but renewed, remade and begun again. The strong suggestion of the cancelling of Trident as both a peace-facing and economically sensible move gains considerable acclaim. Perhaps less so the suggestion of the eradication of the armed forces.

On the other side of the debate, Gavin and Pippa are, perhaps unfairly, forced to defend the notion that elections and conventional democracy bring about change and a better future. Both sought to encourage and challenge their listeners to engagement over and against apathy. When challenged by a question on the possibility of eradicating “the whip”, Gavin spoke forthrightly of the many changes and developments which have been good for all which have come about because of parties working to enforce their whip, and both Gavin and Pippa spoke well of the need for agents of change to be at the heart of the policy and decision making processes in political parties.

Without meaning to sound trite, it was inspiring to see the sincerity and integrity of faith of all four of the speakers on the platform (Ok, that does sound trite, sorry). There was a unity, even in disagreements over policy and process, between all the participants which can so often appear lacking in the heavily edited political discourse most of us are party to. Proof that Christian faith is not limited or contained to a particular party political ideology or set of policies, that the values of the kingdom which is come, and yet still to come too, transcend the archaic controls we attempt to place upon how we communicate ideas. We can agree, and disagree, robustly. We can cry out against injustice, we can dance upon it. We can accuse political adversaries of propagating it, but surely we will all be changed, all of us, without exception.

As the debate drew to a close and those in attendance were asked to vote once again, it became clear that a larger proportion of the room were convinced of the crucial importance of the coming election. Most of all though, it seemed that many of us had been convinced that, however broken our system might be, however much we relate to one another in a broken fashion, it is better to be involved, working and praying for redemption than to wash our hands of the time and circumstances we find ourselves in. Radical change is coming, we can be sure of that. We can only hope, work and pray that it might come sooner, that justice might flow as a mighty river, through our society, but this justice God’s justice, will come, finally. We can be sure of that.